-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2018
-
ID#CFCC-2018-05-LV
Description
Update: June 5, 2018
Cancellation Notice
Update: May 25, 2018
Questions and Answers
The Judicial Council of California seeks the services of a person or entity with expertise in the design, creation and hosting of a website to provide case law, educational content, and resources to a statewide audience of judicial officers, juvenile attorneys, social workers, probation officers, volunteers and others. All content of the website, both initially and on-going updates, will be developed and provided by the Judicial Council.
Questions should be directed to solicitations@jud.ca.gov and must be received by no later than Monday, May 21, 2018.
Proposals must be received by the Judicial Council no later than 3:00 pm, Pacific Time, Wednesday, May 29, 2018.
Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
RFP No: CFCC-2018-05-LV
Attention: Lenore Fraga-Roberts – Bid Desk
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Further details regarding the solicitation are set forth in the RFP No. CFCC-2018-05-LV and related documents provided below:
Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing RFPs
Attachment 2 - Judicial Council Standard Terms and Conditions
Attachment 3 - Bidder’s Acceptance of Terms and Conditions
Attachment 4 - General Certifications Form
Attachment 5 - Darfur Contracting Act Certification Form
Attachment 6 - Vendor Payee Data Record
Attachment 7 - DVBE Declaration
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.