Request for Proposal

Civil Law Institute, CRS SP 253

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2018
  • ID#
    CRS SP 253

Description

Update: March 29, 2018
Intent to Award


Update: February 2, 2018
Questions and Answers


The Judicial Council of California, Conference Support Services seeks proposals from hotels for meeting space, sleeping rooms and food and beverage for September 25-28, 2018 in Long Beach, Petaluma, Rohnert Park, Santa Rosa or San Diego, California.

Proposals must be received by END OF BUSINESS DAY Pacific Time, February 13, 2018.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: 5th Floor Receptionist, RFP No. CRS SP 253
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

E-mail proposals:
Proposals may now be submitted via e-mail. E-mail proposals must be e-mailed to: ConferenceRFPs@jud.ca.gov. Subject line: RFP No. CRS SP 253.

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposals (RFP) No. CRS SP 253.

The Judicial Council of California, Conference and Print Production does not retain the services of third party or outsourced representation. All quoted rates are to be net, non-commissionable

Request for Proposal

Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing RFPs

Attachment 2 – Judicial Council of California Standard Terms and Conditions

Attachment 3 - Vendor's Acceptance of Terms and Conditions

Attachment 4 - Darfur Contracting Act Certification

Attachment 5 – Submission Form for Technical & Cost Proposal

Attachment 6 - Conflict of Interest Certification Form

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.