-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2018
-
ID#FSO-2017-12-RP
Description
Update: March 8, 2018
Intent to Award
Update: February 23, 2018
Short List Announcement
Update: February 6, 2018
Response to Questions
The Judicial Council of California, Facilities Services Office seeks to identify a number of contractors qualified to provide roof construction services for various statewide court facility projects. This solicitation is a means for prospective contractors with experience in performing construction services related to roofing to submit their statement of qualifications to the Judicial Council of California. The Judicial Council anticipates Contracts will be issued to multiple Contractors under this RFQ.
Hard copy statement of qualifications must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: Robin Parker, FSO-2017-12-RP
Branch Accounting and Procurement
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
Further details regarding the requirements of this solicitation and deadlines are set forth in the RFQ and related attachments provided on this webpage.
Attachment A - Service List by Zones
Attachment B - Judicial Council of California Regional Map
Attachment C - Master Contract for Roof Construction Services (Sample Document)
Attachment D - Qualification Questionnaire for Roofing Contractors
Attachment E - Form for Submission of Questions
Attachment F - Payee Record Data Form
Attachment G - Statement of Work (For Informational Purposes)
Attachment H - Minimum Roofing Standards (For Informational Purposes)
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.