Request for Proposal

IDIQ Mechanical Construction Services, FSO-2018-09-JR

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2018
  • ID#
    FSO-2018-09-JR

Description

Update: November 2, 2018
Answers to Questions


The Judicial Council of California, Facilities Services Office seeks to identify a number of contractors qualified to provide mechanical construction services for various statewide court facility projects. This solicitation is a means for prospective contractors with experience in performing mechanical construction services to submit their statement of qualifications to the Judicial Council of California. The Judicial Council anticipates contracts will be issued to multiple Contractors under this RFQ.

Proposals must be delivered by the due date specified in the RFQ to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: Lenore Fraga-Roberts
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102

Further details regarding the submission requirements of the Proposals, and attachments thereto, are set forth in the RFQ. The RFQ and related attachments are posted to this webpage. Firms are advised to check this RFQ webpage on a regular basis for any updates to the RFQ language or change to the Timeline.

RFQ

Attachment A – Service List by Zones

Attachment B – Judicial Council of California Regional Map

Attachment C – Sample Contract for Construction Services

Attachment D – Qualification Questionnaire for Mechanical Contractors

Attachment E – Submission of Questions Form

Attachment F – Payee Data Record

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.