Invitation for Bid

CANCELED: High Volume Digital Black & White Production Presses, IFB-AS-050416-RB

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2016

Description

Update: June 21, 2016
Notice of Cancellation

Update: May 31, 2016
Amendment to Section VII – Tab 2

Update: May 23, 2016
Questions & Answers and Updated Specifications

The Judicial Council of California is seeking vendors to provide bids for Two Production Printers as detailed in invitation to bid # IFB-AS-050416-RB.

Note: There is a mandatory Pre-Proposal Conference that will take place on Wednesday 05/11/16. You will not be able to participate in this solicitation without attending this conference.

Questions regarding this IFB should be directed to Solicitations@jud.ca.gov by Tuesday 05/17/16 by 12:00 noon PDT.

Proposals must be received by Monday 06/06/16, no later than 3:00pm PDT

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: Nadine McFadden, IFB-AS-050416-RB
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Further specific details regarding the solicitation are set forth in IFB-AS-050416-RB and related documents provided, below:

IFB-AS-050416-RB

Attachment 1 – Mandatory Pre-Proposal Conference Agenda and info sheet

Attachment 2 – Scope, Specifications and other requirements

Attachment 3 – Administrative Rules Governing IFBs

Attachment 4 – JCC Terms and Conditions

Attachment 5 – Bidders Acceptance of Terms and Conditions

Attachment 6 – DVBE Declaration

Attachment 7 – Small Business Declaration

Attachment 8 - Payee Data Record Form

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.