-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2014
Description
The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) is seeking firms to provide bids for Dell hardware as detailed in invitation to bid # IFB-ISD-050214-RB. Equipment (95 machines) will be inside delivery and shipped to multiple court locations in California as specified in invitation to bid # IFB-ISD-050214-RB.
NOTE: Winning vendor agrees to honor the IFB-ISD-050214-RB winning bid pricing (for additional unspecified equipment quantities) until June 30th, 2014. This is based on the Ca. courts year end funding resources to purchase additional equipment.
NOTE: Questions regarding this IFB should be directed to Solicitations@jud.ca.gov by Wednesday, May 7th, 2014, at 12:00 noon PDT.
Proposals must be received by Monday, May 19th, 2014 no later than 3:00pm PDT
Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden, IFB-ISD-050214-RB
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Further specific details regarding the solicitation and equipment requirements are set forth in IFB-ISD-050214-RB and related documents provided, below:
IFB-ISD-050214-RB
Specifications and Quantities:
Attachment 1 – Administrative Rules Governing IFB’s
Attachment 2 – AOC Standard Terms and Conditions
Attachment 3 – Bidders Acceptance of Terms and Conditions
Attachment 4 – Darfur Act Certification
DVBE Declaration
Small Business Declaration
Payee Data Record Form
Notice of Intent to Award
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.