-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2018
-
ID#IT-2018-42-RB
Description
Update: March 22, 2018
Intent to Award
Update: March 06, 2018
Answers to Questions
The Judicial Council of California (Judicial Council) maintains several external and internal-facing Web properties, including the California Courts website and a password-protected extranet site. Our California Courts website receives more than a million visitors a month and includes the state’s largest collection of free self-help information; more than 1,300 Judicial Council legal forms, available for download, and a collection of both current and historical Appellate Court legal opinions.
While efforts to ensure Judicial Council websites meet current federal and state standards for web accessibility are ongoing, it is the intention of the Judicial Council to award a single contract to a firm that specializes in online accessibility to conduct an assessment of our sites and provide an implementation plan to help us address any unmet online accessibility requirements discovered as part of the assessment.
The RFP will result in an award for a six (6) month contract. Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to solicitations@jud.ca.gov and must be received no later than 3pm PST, March 2, 2018. Proposals must be delivered to:
Attention: Lenore Fraga-Roberts, Bid Desk
Judicial Council of California
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
RFP No: IT-2018-42-RB
Further details regarding the solicitation are set forth in IT-2018-42-RB and related documents are provided below.
Attachment 1 – Administrative Rules
Attachment 2 – Standard Provisions
Attachment 3 – Acceptance of Terms and Conditions
Attachment 4 – General Certification
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.