Request for Information

Elevator Consulting Services, RFI# REFM-2016-08-SS

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2016

Description

Update: July 12, 2016
New deadline - 3:00 p.m. PDT, July 25, 2016

You are invited to respond with information to assist the Judicial Council of California (“Judicial Council”) in elevator design and consulting services for new construction as well as the modernization of existing structures.

The Judicial Council of California, chaired by the Chief Justice of California, is the chief policy making agency of the California judicial system. The office of Real Estate and Facilities Management (REFM) of the Judicial Council is responsible for managing the state judiciary's portfolio. REFM manages the ongoing needs of more than 500 court judicial branch facilities, representing a 20 million square foot portfolio of court properties housing the largest judiciary in the United States, including operation, maintenance, repair, modifications, and environmental regulatory compliance, as well as site selection and acquisition for new capital projects.

All interested parties should submit a cover sheet, and company description with appropriate supporting information clearly marked “Response to RFI -- ELEVATOR CONSULTING SERVICES” by 3:00 p.m., Pacific Time, on July 25, 2016 to the following point of contact:

Judicial Council of California
Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFI #REFM-2016-08-SS
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
solicitations@jud.ca.gov

RFI: REFM-2016-08-SS (Updated July 12, 2016)

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.