Request for Information

Online Accessibility Evaluation & Implementation Plan, RFI# ITWS-17-17-RBB

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2017

Description

Online Accessibility Evaluation & Implementation Plan, RFI #: ITWS-17-17-RBB

The Judicial Council of California (Judicial Council) is authorized by the California Constitution as the policymaking body and administrative manager of California’s judicial branch. To pursue its purposes, the Judicial Council is forming some high-level cost estimates to plan and deliver an implementation and remediation plan to ensure all Judicial Council-maintained websites are compliant with relevant federal and state online accessibility laws. 

Therefore, a Request for Information (RFI) is hereby issued to develop the criteria, tools, and methodologies needed to initiate, plan, implement and sustain accessible online content throughout our web properties. General requirements are in the areas of Site Assessment(s) Services, Training Program Services and Implementation Plan Services. 

RESPONSES TO THIS RFI ARE DUE: 
3PM PACIFIC TIME,                                                
FEBRUARY 16, 2017

All interested parties should clearly marked their submission as: “RESPONSE TO RFI – ONLINE ACCESSIBILITY EVALUATION & IMPLEMENTATION PLAN” by e-mail to the following point of contact:

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA
Attn: RFI NO. ITWS-17-17-RBB
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
solicitations@jud.ca.gov

RFI #: ITWS-17-17-RBB

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.