-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2021
-
ID#RFP-CRS-SP-356
Description
Update: October 13, 2021
Intent to Award
The Judicial Council of California, Conference Support Services seeks proposals from hotels for meeting rooms, sleeping rooms and food and beverage for March 6-9, 2022, March 1-4, 2022 or February 27-March 2, 2022 in Rohnert Park, Santa Rosa, Napa, Sacramento and Rancho Cordova, California.
Proposals must be received by END OF BUSINESS DAY Pacific Time, September 28, 2021.
Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: 5th Floor Receptionist, RFP No. CRS SP 356
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
E-mail proposals:
Proposals may now be submitted via e-mail. E-mail proposals must be e-mailed to: ConferenceRFPs@jud.ca.gov. Subject line: RFP No. CRS SP 356, Presiding Judge/Court Executive Officer Management Institute.
Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposals (RFP) No. CRS SP 356.
The Judicial Council of California, Conference and Print Production does not retain the services of third party or outsourced representation. All quoted rates are to be net, non-commissionable.
Attachments
Request for Proposal
Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing RFPs
Attachment 2 - Hotel Agreement Template
Attachment 3 - Vendors Acceptance of Terms and Conditions
Attachment 4 - Darfur Contracting Act Certification
Attachment 5 – Submission Form for Technical and Cost Proposal
Attachment 6 – Conflict of Interest Certification Form
Covid-19 Duty of Care Questionnaire
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.