Request for Proposal

19th Annual AB1058 Child Support Training Conference, RFP # CRS AU 129

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2015

Description

The Judicial Council of California, Conference and Registration Services seeks proposals from hotels for a full service conference in San Diego, Orange County/Anaheim or Long Beach locations.

Questions can be directed to conferencesolicitations@jud.ca.gov until end of business day January 12, 2015. Questions and answers received will be posted on January 15, 2015.

Proposals must be received by END OF BUSINESS DAY Tuesday, January 20, 2015
.

Hard copy proposals must be sent/delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: 5th floor Receptionist, RFP # CRS AU129
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposals (RFP) # CRS AU 129

The Judicial Council of California, Conference & Registration Services does not retain the services of third party or outsourced representation. All quoted rates are to be net, not commissionable.

Request for Proposal

Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing RFPs

Attachment 2 - AOC Standard Terms and Conditions

Attachment 3 – Vendor’s Acceptance of Terms and Conditions

Attachment 4 - Darfur Contracting Act Certification

Attachment 5 – Submission Form for Technical and Cost Proposal

Attachment 6 – Conflict of Interest Certification Form

Attachment 7 – Questions and Answers

Intent to Award

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.