Request for Proposal

2009 Youth/Peer Court Summit

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2009

Description


RFP Number: CFCC 15-08-CT

The Administrative Office of the Courts seeks to identify and retain a California Youth/Peer Court Coordinator or staff, a California County Office of Education or Representative, or a California Peer/Teen Court Association to organize and manage the annual peer/youth court event for 130-150 participants at a higher education institution in southern California and to fund all expenses, including lodging and activity expenses, related to the event.

Questions regarding the RFP should be submitted in writing, as specified in the RFP, to the AOC no later than 1:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) February 24, 2009. The AOC estimates that answers to questions submitted by the deadline should be posted by February 27, 2009.

Written proposals must be received no later than 3:00 p.m. (Pacific Time), March 5, 2009.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFP# CFCC 15-08-CT
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102

Further details regarding solicitation and program requirements are set forth in the RFP No. CFCC 15-08-CT, 2009 Youth/Peer Court Summit, below:

Request for Proposal

Attachment A – Administrative Rules

Attachment B – Minimum Contract Terms

Attachment C – Acceptance of Minimum Contract

Attachment D – Payee Data Record

Questions and Answers

Notice of Non-Award

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.