-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2015
Description
Update: December 15, 2015
Intent to Award
The Judicial Council of California, Conference Support Services seeks proposals from hotels for sleeping rooms for March 27-29, 2016 and May 1-3, 2016 in Sacramento, California.
This is a new process for sourcing hotels and meeting locations and for this program we will be conducting a Pre Proposal Conference Call to answer any questions regarding this specific RFP and the new process. Please call into the number provided below in order to ask your questions in a public conference call. It is strongly recommended that you use this opportunity to ask for clarification on the process, as it is completely new.
Proposals must be received by END OF BUSINESS DAY Pacific Time, Tuesday, November 24, 2015.
Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: 5th Floor Receptionist, RFP No. CRS SP 165
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposals (RFP) No. CRS SP 165.
The Judicial Council of California, Conference Support Services does not retain the services of third party or outsourced representation. All quoted rates are to be net, not commissionable.
Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing RFPS
Attachment 2 - Hotel Agreement Template
Attachment 3 - Vendors Acceptance of Terms and Conditions
Attachment 4 - Darfur Contracting Act Certification
Attachment 5 – Submission Form for Technical and Cost Proposal
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.