-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2017
Description
Update: August 16, 2017
Intent to Award
The Judicial Council of California, Conference Services Unit seeks proposals from hotels for a full conference in the City of Industry, Pomona or Burbank, CA for the April 2018 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute Program.
Question can be directed to conferenceqanda@jud.ca.gov until end of business day Wednesday, July 12, 2017. Questions and answers received will be posted on Thursday, July 13, 2017.
Proposals must be received by END OF BUSINESS DAY, Monday, July24, 2017
Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: 5th Floor Receptionist, RFP # CRS PD 229
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA, 94102
Email proposals must be delivered to:
conferencerfps@jud.ca.gov
Email Proposals: Must include the RFP # (CRS PD 229) and the name of the program (Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute) in the subject line of the email message.
Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in the Request for Proposals (RFP) No. CRS PD 229
The Judicial Council of California, Conference and Registration Services does not retain the services of third party or outsourced representation. All quoted rates are to be net, not commissionable.
Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing RFPs
Attachment 2 - Judicial Council of California Hotel Agreement Template
Attachment 3 - Vendors Acceptance of Terms and Conditions
Attachment 4 - Darfur Contracting Act Certification
Attachment 5 - Submission Form for Technical Requirements and Cost Proposal
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.