-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2017
Description
Update: May 26, 2017
Notice of Intent to Award
Update: May 24, 2017
Notice of Public Opening of Bid
Update: May 8, 2017
RFP - Revision 1
Addendum 1
Update: May 8, 2017
Answers to Questions
The Center for Families, Children and the Courts (CFCC) in collaboration with the Criminal Justice Services Office (CJS) was tasked by the Judicial Council of California (Judicial Council) to look for a service provider and to manage the resulting contract to conduct a comprehensive stakeholder/user assessment on the California Collaborative Courts public web site (http://www.courts.ca.gov/programs-collabjustice.htm).
The RFP will result in an award for a contract with a term starting June 19, 2017 and ending December 31, 2017. Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to solicitations@jud.ca.gov and must be received no later than 1pm PST, May 5, 2017. Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Attention: Lenore Fraga-Roberts, Bid Desk
RFP No: CFCC-CCW17-23RB
Judicial Council of California
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Further details regarding the solicitation are set forth in the above captioned RFP and related documents are provided below.
Attachment 1 – Administrative Rules
Attachment 2 – Contract Terms and Conditions
Attachment 3 – Acceptance of Terms and Conditions
Attachment 4 – General Certifications
Attachment 5 – Darfur Certification
Attachment 6 – Payee Data Record
Attachment 7 – DVBE Bidder Declaration
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.