Request for Proposal

Canceled 12/6/2013 - 2015 Language Need and Interpreter Use Study, RFP# CLASP LNS2015

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2013

Description

The Judicial Council’s Court Language Access Support Program (CLASP), formerly known as the Court Interpreter Program (CIP), seeks a single consultant to conduct a study of language need and interpreter use in the trial courts. The preferred consultant will have staff with experience in quantitative and qualitative research methodologies and trends. Findings and recommendations from this study will assist in the designation of languages to be included in the California Court Interpreter Certification Program.

Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to Solicitations@jud.ca.gov by 9:00 am Pacific Time, October 21, 2013.

Proposals must be received by 3:00 pm Pacific Time, November 4, 2013.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Fiscal Services, Business Services Unit
Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFP # CLASP LNS2015
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102

Request for Proposals

Attachment 1: Administrative Rules Governing RFPs (Non-IT Services)

Attachment 2: Agreement Terms and Conditions

Attachment 3: Proposer’s Acceptance of Agreement Terms and Conditions

Attachment 4: Conflict of Interest Certification Form

Attachment 5: Darfur Contracting Act Certification

Attachment 6: Payee Data Record Form

Attachment 7: Court Interpreter Region Map

Attachment 8: Pricing Form

Addendum 1

Questions and Answers

Cancellation Notice

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.