-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2015
Description
Cancellation Notice (April 28, 2015)
The Judicial Council of California seeks proposals for Attorney contract writers for Judicial Publications in Probate Law. The Center for Judiciary Education and Research, which develops and delivers education and training to California Judges and Judicial Branch employees, seeks the services of an author with expertise in California probate law and conservatorships, as well as expertise in writing for legal journals and other legal professional publications. The person must be California licensed attorney with experience conducting legal research for the purposes of reviewing, writing, revising, and updating legal publications for use by California Judges.
Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to Solicitations@jud.ca.gov by Friday, April 15, 2015.
Proposals must be received by the Judicial Council by April 27, 2015 no later than 2:00 P.M. Pacific Time.
Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFP: CJER-2015-03-LV
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Further details regarding the solicitation and work requirements are set forth in the RFP No. CJER-2015-03-LV and related documents provided below:
RFP
Attachment 1 Administrative Rules Governing RFPs
Attachment 2 Judicial Council Standard Terms and Conditions
Attachment 3 Proposer’s Acceptance of Contract Terms and Conditions
Attachment 4 General Certifications Form
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.