Request for Proposal

Curriculum Development for Tribal Advocate Skills - Family Violence in Native Communities

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2010

Description


RFP Number: CFCC 04-10-LM Curriculum Development

The purpose of this Request for Proposal is to secure a contract to provide the services of a consultant with curriculum development experience to aid in the following:

  • Reach out to tribal organizations and service providers in the area of family violence
  • Facilitate meetings of the Tribal Advocate Curriculum Advisory Group
  • Conduct research to identify existing curricula
  • Determine relevant case law, statutes, rules, policies, and academic research that may inform the development of the curriculum
  • Develop new curriculum that includes alternative approaches to accommodate the varying levels and styles of learning
  • Provide a plan for rolling out and piloting the completed curriculum

Questions should be directed to solicitations@jud.ca.gov by April 20, 2010, end of business.

Proposals must be received by May 11, 2010, end of business.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:

Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFP: CFCC 04-10-LM
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Further details regarding the solicitation and program requirements are set forth in CFCC 04-10-LM and related documents provided, below:

Request for Proposal

Attachment 1 - Payee Data Record Form

Questions and Answers

Notice of Cancellation

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.