Request for Proposal

Developing the Guide to Juvenile Delinquency Court Performance Measures

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2009

Description


RFP Number: CFCC-09-09-CT

The AOC seeks to identify and retain a consultant with expertise in juvenile delinquency, court processes, developing court performance measures, and working with court and juvenile justice stakeholders in order to review existing research and practices, define performance measures, gather feedback from stakeholders, build consensus for performance measurement in juvenile delinquency, and co-author the guide to performance measurement with AOC staff.

Questions regarding the RFP should be submitted in writing, as specified in the RFP, to the AOC no later than 1:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) April 30, 2009. The AOC estimates that answers to questions submitted by the deadline should be posted by May 4, 2009.

Written proposals must be received no later than 3:00 p.m. (Pacific Time), May 11, 2009.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden - RFP# CFCC-09-09-CT
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102

Further details regarding solicitation and program requirements are set forth in the RFP No. CFCC-09-09-CT, Developing the Guide to Juvenile Delinquency Court Performance Measures, below:

Request for Proposal

Attachments 1, 2, 3, and 5

Attachment 4 - Payee Data Record

Appendix A

Questions and Answers

Addendum 1

Notice of Intent to Award a Contract

Notice of Contract Award

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.