Request for Proposal

Employee Assistance Program for the State of California’s Judicial Branch

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2009

Description


RFP Number: HR-2009-01-CT

The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) seeks to identify and retain a qualified service provider to deliver employee assistance benefits to a population of approximately 4,400 Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) administrative, professional and support employees, justices, judges, subordinate judicial officers and their dependents located in all 58 counties of the State of California.

Questions regarding the RFP should be submitted in writing, as specified in the RFP, to the AOC by 3:00 pm (Pacific Time) on August 31, 2009. The AOC estimates that answers to questions submitted by the deadline should be posted by September 4, 2009.

Written proposals must be received by 3:00 pm (Pacific Time) September 30, 2009.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden - RFP# HR-2009-01-CT
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102

Further details regarding solicitation and program requirements are set forth in the RFP No. HR-2009-01-CT, Employee Assistance Program for the State of California's Judicial Branch, below:

Request for Proposal (including Attachment A – Administrative Rules)


Appendix A - List of Covered Subscribers


Attachment B - Minimum Contract Terms


Attachment C - Vendor Acceptance Form


Attachment D - Payee Data Record


Attachment 5 - DVBE Participation Form


Attachment 6 - Cost Proposal Form


Attachment 7 - Reference Form


Addendum 1


Questions and Answers


Appendix B


Appendix C


Appendix D

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.