-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2008
Description
RFP Number: HR-200808-RB
The AOC seeks a qualified service provider to perform ergonomic evaluations, as needed, for current employees, new hires, workstation changes, and follow-up evaluations. This RFP is the means for prospective service providers to submit their qualifications to the AOC and request selection as a service provider. Due to the geographic locations where assessments are needed, the AOC may elect to enter into one contract with one service provider for the Northern California offices in Sacramento or San Francisco, one contract with one service provider for the Southern California office in Burbank, or one contract with one service provider for both Northern and Southern California offices. Proposals for providing services in Northern California will be evaluated separately from the proposals for providing services in Southern California. Written proposals must be received no later than Thursday 1:00 p.m., October 16, 2008. Hard copy proposals must be delivered to: Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposal (RFP) No. HR-200808-RB. Request for Proposals *Revised Attachment A - Administrative Rules Attachment B - Terms and Conditions Attachment C - Contract Exceptions Form Attachment D - Pricing Attachment E - Payee Data Record Addendum 1 Questions and Answers Intent to Award
Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden - HR-200808-RB
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.