-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2003
Description
CFCC 04-25-03-B
This Request for Proposals ("RFP") is issued April 30, 2003 to identify a qualified consultant to provide a programming in SAS to the Administrative Office of the Courts ("AOC") for a project to create statistical tables for a website. The AOC seeks the services of a consultant with expertise in programming with SAS to create HTML and Excel table output. The data files and documentation will be provided. The consultant must be skilled at writing SAS code that will create tables with filenames and headers that reflect a complex tree structure. The code must be easily modified so that changes can be made to table formats and the tables recreated without extensive reprogramming. The consultant should be skilled in PROC TABULATE, ODS/HTML, and DDE applications, as well as in merging files and in SAS macros. This project will provide the AOC with the static table content for a statistical website, estimated at 1,500 to 2,000 tables. Consultants are asked to submit proposals by 5 p.m. on Thursday, May 8, 2003. Services are expected to be performed by the consultants beginning on or about June 1, 2003 through August 31, 2003. For further information regarding this RFP, please contact Deana Piazza, Senior Research Analyst, Administrative Office of the Courts/Center for Families, Children & the Courts, 455 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94102. Telephone: 415-865-4225; E-mail: deana.piazza@jud.ca.gov. RFP for Prototype Tables for Statistical Information Website- CFCC 04-25-03-B
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.