Request for Proposal

RFP Independent Code Quality Assessment

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2011

Description

RFP Number: ISD-201004-GW

The Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) seeks proposals from highly qualified firms that can conduct an independent code quality assessment appraisal of the California Case Management System development project.

Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to the solicitations@jud.ca.gov no later than May 9, 2011, 5:00 p.m. PT.

Hard copy proposals must be received no later than May 20, 2011, at 3:00 p.m. PT.

Proposals must be sent to:

Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFP No. ISD-201004-GW
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposal (RFP) No. ISD-201004-GW.

Request for Proposal

Attachment 1, Administrative Rules Governing Request for Proposals

Attachment 2, Contract Terms and Conditions

  • PDF Format | DOC Format

    Schedule 1, California Multiple Award Schedules (CMAS) General Provisions - Information Technology (GSPD-401IT-CMAS)

    Schedule 2, AOC Travel Rate Guidelines - Consultants

Attachment 3, Proposer's Acceptance of the RFP's Contract Terms

Attachment 4, Payee Data Record Form

Attachment 5, Pricing Information and Conditions

Attachment 6, Pricing Proposal Template

Questions and Answers #1

Addendum #1

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.