-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2010
Description
RFP Number: FIN1010SSE
The AOC, the Superior Courts of California, the California Appellate Courts, and the Supreme Court of California, are collectively known as a "member of the Purchasing Group" or "Purchasing Group member" and are requesting proposals from highly qualified Proposers with expertise in providing security screening equipment and providing maintenance services and support, installation, and training services for this equipment on a statewide basis. Purchasing Group members may elect, but are not required, to purchase such equipment and services from any Master Agreement that results from this RFP. The security screening equipment shall include magnetometers and cabinet x-ray systems.
Questions should be directed to solicitations@jud.ca.gov by November 23, 2010, by 2:00 P.M.
Proposals must be received by December 13, 2010, by 2:00 P.M.
Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFP: FIN1010SSE
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Request for Proposal
Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules
Attachment 2 - Work to be Performed
Attachment 3 - Payment Provisions
Attachment 4 - Master Agreement General Conditions
Attachment 5 - Vendor's Acceptance
Attachment 6 - Certification Regarding Debarment and Suspension
Attachment 7 - Payee Data Record
Attachment 8 - DBVE Participation Form
Attachment 9 - Purchasing Group List
Security Screening Equipment Email to Potential Proposer
Questions and Answers
Intent to Award
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.