-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2008
Description
RFP Number: FIN-0708-OS
The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), on behalf of the California Appellate Courts, which includes the Supreme Court of California, the 58 Superior Courts of California, the Habeas Corpus Resource Center, the AOC and the County Law Libraries (individually referred to as a Purchasing Group member) is requesting proposals from highly qualified vendors with expertise in providing standard office supplies, including copier paper and toner, on a statewide basis. The AOC intends to award one or more Master Agreements, for an initial two year term and three one-year options, to a vendor or vendors able to supply the Purchasing Group members with an unknown quantity of office supplies, as further described in the RFP. Each of the Purchasing Group members may individually, at their discretion, order offices supplies, including copier paper and toner, from any Master Agreement that may result from this RFP. Proposals must be received prior to 1 p.m. on August 12, 2008. Hard copy proposals must be delivered to: Judicial Council of California Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposal (RFP) No. FIN-0708-OS. Request for Proposal Addendum No. 1 / Questions and Answers Addendum No. 2 and Q&A Attachment A - Revision 1 (Master Agreement Terms and Conditions) Attachment B – Purchasing Group Address List Attachment B – Supplemental Material Attachment D – Pricing Sheets, Revision 1 Attachment F – Std 204, Payee Date Form Estimated Office Supply Volumes Intent to Award
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden, FIN-0708-OS
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.