Request for Proposal

Test Administration for Court Interpreters State Examinations

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2006

Description

The AOC seeks the services of a service provider with extensive expertise in language testing to administer the statewide examination process for certification and registration of California court interpreters. This service provider will conduct written and oral test administration, including registration, scoring, reporting, and other related services to determine and certify the qualifications of spoken language interpreters used in state trial court proceedings. The service provider chosen will administer the existing State-owned examinations and exam materials for both certification exams in twelve (12) designated languages as well as English written and oral proficiency examinations for interpreters in non-designated languages.

Written proposals must be received no later than 1:00 p.m. on July 7, 2006.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFP No. 05-EOP-45065049-01
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102

There will be no pre-proposal bidder's conference for this Request for Proposal (RFP). Any questions regarding this RFP No. 06-EOP-45065049-01 must be sent to solicitations@jud.ca.gov no later than 1:00 p.m., June 2, 2006.

Further details regarding solicitation and program requirements are set forth in the Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 06-EOP-45065049-01 and related documents below:

Modifications to any RFP document will be dated and posted directly below the document.

Request for Proposal (RFP)

Attachment(s)

Related Documents

Intent to Award

Notice of Contract Award

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.