-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2015
Description
Update: April 15, 2015
RFP Project Schedule:
8. Master Agreements will be provided to selected firms Thursday April 16, 2015
9. Signed Master Agreement returned to the Judicial Council. Thursday April 30, 2015
Update: March 25, 2015
Price Points and Final Scores
| Final Rank |
Organization | Price Points | Technical Proposal Points |
Total Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stewart Title | 29 | 54.75 | 83.75 |
| 2 | Chicago Title Company | 23 | 50.88 | 73.88 |
| 3 | Commonwealth Land Title Company | 20 | 53.5 | 73.5 |
| 4 | Old Republic Title Company | 0* | 51.63 | 51.63 |
*Prices were not correctly submitted and could not be evaluated
In order to ensure geographic coverage of the entire State, as specified in the RFP, the Judicial Council will award contracts to the top three ranked organizations. Awarded organizations can expect that contracts will be e-mailed to them April 7 or shortly thereafter.
The Judicial Council wishes to extend its thanks to all participants in this process.
Update: March 18, 2015
Technical Proposal Scores for All Subject Areas, Except Price
- Old Republic Title Company 51.63 points
- Commonwealth Land Title Company 53.50 points
- Chicago Title Company 50.88 points
- Stewart Title 54.75 points
Update: February 10, 2015
Addendum 2: Questions and Answers
Update: February 5, 2015
Addendum 1 Revised: Question Period Re-Opened/Revised Schedule of Events
Update: January 28, 2015
Questions and Answers:
There were no questions submitted to the Judicial Council for this RFP.
The Judicial Council of California’s Real Estate and Facilities Management office seeks to identify and retain two or more qualified firms to provide title, escrow and related services required to evaluate and/or convey properties to the Judicial Branch or to sell or otherwise dispose of State equity in existing Judicial Branch properties throughout California. This RFP is the means for title firms to submit their qualifications and pricing Proposals to the Judicial Council for consideration, along with detailed descriptions of services provided.
The Schedule of events pertaining to this RFP is posted below the documents provided here:
Request for Proposal
Master Agreement
Forms
- Form for Submission of Questions
- Technical Proposal Form
- Price Proposal Form
- DVBE Participation Form
- Payee Data Record Form
RFP Project Schedule:
|
Description |
Dates - (PST) |
|
|---|---|---|
|
1. |
RFP is Issued. |
January 05, 2015 |
|
2. |
Pre-proposal teleconference call regarding RFP: Participants wishing to participate, dial 877-820-7831. Pass code: 633780 |
Tuesday, January 20, 2015 |
|
3. |
Deadline for submitting requests to the Judicial Council for additional information, clarifications, or RFP modifications. E-mail all questions, using the Form for Submission of Questions to: |
Tuesday, January 27, 2015 |
|
4. |
Judicial Council will post answers to participants’ requests for additional information, clarifications or RFP modifications, on the California Courts website pertaining to this RFP, Bidders / Solicitations page, located at: http://www.courts.ca.gov/rfps.htm |
Tuesday, February 03, 2015 |
|
5. |
Deadline for submission of Proposals: |
Not later than 2:00 p.m. PST on |
|
6. |
Technical Proposal scores for all subject areas, except price, will be posted. |
Tuesday, March 17, 2015 |
|
7. |
Price Proposal scores and publication of Notice of Intent to Award will be posted on the California Courts website pertaining to this RFP: http://www.courts.ca.gov/rfps.htm |
Tuesday, March 24, 2015 |
|
8. |
Master Agreements will be provided to selected firms. |
Thursday, April 16, 2015 |
|
9. |
Signed Master Agreement returned to the Judicial Council. |
Thursday, April 30, 2015 |
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.