-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2015
Description
The Judicial Council of California, through this Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”) is soliciting for qualified business entities/firms to establish a pool of Firms for the Judicial Council’s current and future Court Building Projects throughout the State. As assigned by the Judicial Council’s Principal Architect, these services include, but need not be limited to, evaluation of the design for compatibility with its setting and the appropriateness to the project’s functional program, the California Trial Court Facilities Standards, and the Project budget.
Selected firms will participate in various Design Review Panels to provide architectural peer review & evaluation of the design for one or more court building project(s). A list of the current Projects slated for Design Reviews is attached hereto as Attachment “A.”
Proposal and written statement of qualifications must be received no later than 4:00 PM, Thursday, April 2, 2015.
Requests for clarifications or modifications must be submitted to CaptialProgramSolications@jud.ca.gov no later than 1:00 PM, Thursday, March 19, 2015.
Hard copy SOQs/proposals must be delivered to :
Judicial Council of California
Attn: Nadine McFadden – JBCP-2015-03-JT
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in RFQ No. JBCP-2015-03-JT
Request for Qualifications (Including Attachments A and B)
Attachment C - Payee Data Record Form
Attachment D - Vendor Questions Form
Response to Vendor Questions
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.