-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2016
Description
Update: October 28, 2016
Intent to Award
Update: October 19, 2016
The Judicial Council is extending the deadline dates for this solicitation. The revised dates are shown below.
Update: September 22, 2016
Short List Announcement
Update: September 14, 2016
The Judicial Council is extending the deadline dates for this solicitation. The revised dates are shown below.
Update: September 1, 2016
The Judicial Council is extending the deadline dates for this solicitation. The revised dates are shown below.
Update: August 18, 2016
The Judicial Council is extending the deadline dates for this solicitation. The revised dates are shown below.
Update: August 10, 2016
Timeline Revised (See below)
Update: July 27, 2016
Correction
Update: July 22, 2016
Questions and Answers
The Judicial Council seeks statements of qualifications from interested firms, and/or persons with experience and technical qualifications related to construction project plan review and inspection services (Consultant) required in various phases of the repair or construction of court buildings. It is anticipated that contracts will be issued to at least six firms.
| Event | Date |
|---|---|
| RFQ issued | July 12, 2016 |
| Deadline for questions | July 18, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) |
| Questions and answers posted (estimate only) | July 21, 2016 |
| Latest date and time qualifications may be submitted | August 2, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) |
| Posting of Short-listed Consultants (estimate only) | September 21, 2016 |
| Interviews of Short-listed Consultants (estimate only) | October 6 and 11, 2016 |
| Notice of Intent to Award (estimate only) (Revised Date) | October 28, 2016 |
Proposals must be delivered by the date and time listed on the coversheet of this RFQ to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFQ# JBCP-2016-06-CP
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.