-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2019
-
ID#SC-19-55-RB
Description
This RFP is the means for Proposers to submit their qualifications to the JCC and request selection as a Contractor for these services.
The Supreme Court seeks the goods and services of a person or entity with expertise in working in a historic building. The display cases will be used for historical documents, books, pictures, fabrics etc. The large cases will consist of 3 pieces placed side by side to create 1 display case. The smaller case will be placed opposite the passenger elevators. Wood case preferably Oak stained to match existing wood and historical characteristics of the building. The wood should be adequately sealed or sustainable. Each case should have solid back and end pieces, with 2 sliding safety UV filtered glass doors with a lock and overhead lighting. The materials used to construct the object chamber be as inert/chemically stable as possible. Powder-coated finishes, unbleached linen, Ethafoam (for mounting decks) are examples of stable materials.
Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to solicitations@jud.ca.gov and must be received no later than 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time, May 22, 2019.
Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Attention: Bid Desk
RFP NUMBER: SC-19-55-RB
Judicial Council of California
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Further details regarding the solicitation are set forth in the RFP and related documents are provided below.
Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.