-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2019
-
ID#IT-2019-60-RB
Description
Update: March 5, 2020
Intent to Award
Update: March 2, 2020
Notice of Non-Cost Technical Scores
Update: February 28, 2020
Notice of Date Change - Public Opening of Cost Portion of Proposals
Update: January 17, 2020
IT-2019-60-RB-Attachment-9-References (Word version)
Update: January 13, 2020
Questions and Answers
IT-2019-60-RB-RFP Appendix C - Vendor Response Template
IT-2019-60-RB-RFP-A2 Standard Agreement
In support of Question #21, the following PDF documents are being provided:
- SAP Readiness Check 2.0
- EWA – Portal Production
- EWA – BW Production
- EWA – ECC Production
- EWA – Solution Manager
Update: December 18, 2019
Notice of Pre-Proposal Conference
This RFP is the means for Proposers to submit their qualifications to the JCC and request selection as a Contractor for these services.
The Judicial Council of California ("JCC") is seeking to acquire systems integration services to perform:
- Migration of its Phoenix SAP ECC ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) to a Cloud Services Provider ("CSP") hosting SAP Suite on HANA, or alternatively, S/4HANA; and
- Migration of its Phoenix SAP Business Warehouse ("BW") to a Cloud Services Provider hosting SAP BW on HANA.
Proposers shall propose a Project solution with either Amazon Web Services ("AWS") or Microsoft Azure as the target environment. Tenants will be secured by the JCC using one of its existing Judicial Branch Leveraged Purchase Agreements ("LPA") currently in effect. It is assumed that all services (e.g. SAP-certified compute and storage) necessary to support cloud hosting services for the Project are available from AWS or Microsoft Azure under these respective LPAs.
Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to solicitations@jud.ca.gov and must be received no later than 3pm PST, February 10, 2020. Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Attention: Bid Desk
RFP: IT-2019-60-RB
Title: Phoenix Cloud Migration
Branch Accounting and Procurement | Administrative Division
Judicial Council of California
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Further details regarding the solicitation are set forth in the RFP and related documents are provided below.
IT-2019-60-RB-Request-for-Proposal
IT-2019-60-RB-Attachment-1-Administrative-Rules
IT-2019-60-RB-Attachment-2-Standard-Agreement
IT-2019-60-RB-Attachment-3-Acceptance-TCs
IT-2019-60-RB-Attachment-4-General-Certs
IT-2019-60-RB-Attachment-5-Small-Biz
IT-2019-60-RB-Attachment-6-Darfur
IT-2019-60-RB-Attachment-7-Unruh
IT-2019-60-RB-Attachment-8-Form 204
IT-2019-60-RB-Attachment-9-References
IT-2019-60-RB-Attachment-10-DVBE-Bidder-Decl
IT-2019-60-RB-Attachment-11-DVBE-Decl
Exhibits:
Exhibit 1 - Phoenix Program
Exhibit 2 - Phoenix Organization
Exhibit 3 - Interface List
Exhibit 4 - BPML List
Exhibit 5 - Custom Object Workbook
Exhibit 6 - Current Landscape
Exhibit 7 - Target Landscape
Exhibit 8 - Implementation RACI
Exhibit 9 - JB 2020 JC Calendar
Exhibit 10 - Infrastructure Assessment
Exhibit 11 - Anticipated Storage Requirements
Exhibit 12 - Readiness Check Baseline
Exhibit 13 - JCTC Information Systems Controls
Exhibit 14 - ST03N Transaction Profile July
Exhibit 15 - List of Reports
Exhibit 16 - JCC Security Architecture
Appendices:
IT-2019-60-RB-RFP-Appendix-A-PRRI
IT-2019-60-RB-RFP-Appendix-A-1-0-Fundamental-Requirements-RTM
IT-2019-60-RB-RFP-Appendix-A-2-0-System-Implementation-RTM
IT-2019-60-RB-RFP-Appendix-A-3-0-Functional-RTM
IT-2019-60-RB-RFP-Appendix-A 4-0-Phoenix-Technical-RTM
IT-2019-60-RB-RFP-Appendix-C-Vendor-Response-Template
IT-2019-60-RB-RFP-Appendix-D1-Cost-Proposal-Instructions
IT-2019-60-RB-RFP-Appendix-D2-Resource-Planner
IT-2019-60-RB-RFP-Appendix-D3-Schedule-Planner
IT-2019-60-RB-RFP-Appendix-D4-Cost-Proposal-Response-Templatex
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.