Construction Management Services for the New Fort Ord Courthouse

Description

Update: January 18, 2024
Notice of Intent to Award

Update: December 19, 2023
The Notice of Intent to Award will not be posted, December 18th, as interviews and final evaluations are still underway. The Notice of Intent to Award will be posted as soon as possible following completion of interviews and final evaluations. Please check this webpage frequently for updated as they become available. Thank you.

Update: December 1, 2023
Notice of Shortlist for Interviews

Update: October 31, 2023

• Addendum - 1
• Answers to Submitted Questions

RFP#: RFP-FS-2023-14-MY
RFP Title: Construction Management Services for the New Fort Ord Courthouse

The Judicial Council, through this Request for Proposals for Construction Management Services (“RFP”), is soliciting proposals as set forth below (“Proposal(s)”) from qualified firms, partnerships, corporations, associations, persons, or professional organizations (“Firm(s)”) to provide Construction Management (“Services”) to oversee, manage, and administer the planning, design, and construction of the New Fort Ord Courthouse Project (“Project”) utilizing the design build delivery method.

The Judicial Council anticipates one (1) Standard Agreement will be issued to a Firm under this RFP.

A Pre-Proposal Conference will be held via Microsoft Teams on October 17, 2023, at 11:00 AM, Pacific Time.

Meeting ID: 253 699 100 749
Participant Code: abPxAb
Meeting link: Click here to join the meeting

Questions regarding the RFP should be submitted via email to Solicitations@jud.ca.gov no later than October 25, 2023, by 3:00 PM, Pacific Time.

Proposals must be received no later than November 14, 2023, by 3:00 PM, Pacific Time.

The Judicial Council will only accept Proposals in an electronic format. Firms must submit their Proposals with all required contents in two parts: the Firm’s Written Proposal and the Firm’s Cost Proposal. The Firm’s Written and Cost Proposal files must be emailed no more than three (3) days in advance of the proposal due date to the following email addresses:

Email SOQ Proposal to: fs202314my.SOQ@jud.ca.gov
Email Cost Proposal to: fs202314my.COST@jud.ca.gov

Further details regarding this solicitation and work requirements are set forth in the RFP and the related documents listed below. Attachments are posted to the RFP webpage as separate documents:

Request for Proposals - Addendum 1 (revised 10/31/2023) including:

Attachment 1, Administrative Rules Governing RFPs (Non-IT Services)
Attachment 2, Form of Construction Manager Services Agreement for the New Fort Ord Courthouse - Addendum 1 (revised 11/1/2023)
Attachment 3, Firm Personnel Billing Rates
Attachment 4, General Certifications Form
Attachment 5, DIR Contractor Registration Statement
Attachment 6, Darfur Contracting Act Certification Form
Attachment 7, Standard Form 330
Attachment 8A, Payee Data Record Form
Attachment 8B, Payee Data Record Supplement
Attachment 9, Form for Submission of Questions
Attachment 10, Iran Contracting Certification [for solicitations of $1,000,000 or more]
Attachment 11, Unruh Civil Rights Act and California Fair Employment and Housing Act Certification [for solicitations of $100,000 or more]
Attachment 12, Judicial Council Standard CMA Staffing Plan
Attachment 13, Not Used
Attachment 14, Conflict of Interest Policy

Links
PAYEE DATA RECORD FORM (STD 204)
(https://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dgs/fmc/pdf/std204.pdf)

PAYEE DATA RECORD SUPPLEMENT (STD 205)
(https://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dgs/fmc/pdf/std205.pdf)

NOTE: The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Firms are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Firm’s proposal.