-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2017
Description
Update: September 27, 2017
Edmund Edelman Courthouse, Solicitation No. REFM-2016-27-BD has been cancelled.
The Judicial Council would like to thank interested Firms for their time and interest in this project
Update: September 14, 2017
Rescheduling Notice of Intent to Award from September 15, 2017 to September 29, 2017.
Request for Proposal - Revision 9
Update: September 1, 2017
Rescheduling Notice of Intent to Award from September 1, 2017 to September 15, 2017.
Request for Proposal - Revision 8
Update: August 17, 2017
Addendum no. 1 includes items issued as response to pre-bid requests for clarification submitted by bidders.
- Addendum 1 including
- Form for Submission of Questions (Attachment 4) with the Architect’s response to bidder questions and two (2) attachment details.
- Detail regarding the two (2) additive alternates for this project.
- Request for Proposal – Revision 7
- Scope of Work, Project Manual and Drawings (Attachment 2) – Revision 2
- Cost Proposal Form (Attachment 5) – Revision 1
Update: August 8, 2017
RFP Revision 6
Sample Agreement Revision 1
Update: July 27, 2017
RFP Revision 5
Update: July 21, 2017
RFP Revision 4
Scope of Work Revision 1
Update: July 12, 2017
RFP Revision 3
Update: July 10, 2017
RFP Revision 2
Update: June 16, 2017
RFP Revision 1
Update: May 22, 2017
Instructions for Pre-Proposal Site Visit
The Judicial Council seeks to retain the services of a qualified construction Firm to complete the Exterior Insulation and Finish System (“EIFS”) Exterior Wall Replacement construction project described in this Request for Proposal (“RFP”) and in the Contract Documents (“Project”). The Judicial Council is seeking Statements of Qualifications and Proposals from Firms to provide EIFS installation construction services for the Project, subject to the conditions described in this RFP.
The EIFS Exterior Wall Replacement Project will take place at the following location:
- Edmund D. Edelman Children’s Courthouse facility, located at 201 Centre Plaza Drive, Monterey Park, CA 91754 (“Facility”).
Project Description:
- The Project includes, but is not limited to, the removal and replacement of the existing EIFS, including exterior sheathing and sealant joints, and replacement with a drainage EIFS assembly.
The objective of this Request for Proposal (RFP) is to contract with a selected Proposer for the described services. One contractor may be selected for this project.
Questions regarding the RFP should be submitted in writing to the Court via Solicitations@jud.ca.gov by Close of Business, June 6th, 2017
Proposals must be received by no later than 3:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on June 21st, 2017
Hard copies of proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: Lenore Fraga-Roberts, REFM-2016-27-BD-RFP
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
Further details regarding this solicitation and work requirements are set forth in the RFP#: REFM-2016-27-BD, EIFS Exterior Wall Replacement Project and the related documents listed below:
Request for Proposals - EIFS Exterior Wall Replacement Project
Attachment 1 - Directions for FTP Login
Attachment 2 - Login to FTP to access these files
Attachment 3 - Sample Agreement with applicable Exhibits
Attachment 4 - Form for Submission of Questions
Attachment 5 - Form for Submission of Cost Proposal
Attachment 6 - Form for Designated Subcontractors List
Attachment 7 - Payee Data Record Form
Attachment 8 - DBVE Participation Form
Attachment 9 - DBVE Bidders Declaration Form
Attachment 10 - Acceptance of Terms and Conditions Form
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.