Request for Proposal

Trial Court Workload Methodology

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2009

Description


RFP Number: EOP 090416-RB

The AOC seeks the services of a consultant with expertise in the evaluation of workload, performance, and court administration to develop a methodology to evaluate the workload and associated levels of performance. The study must include an initial evaluation of workload and associated performance levels for both judges and court staff across the entire range of case types heard in the trial courts. If in the course of that evaluation it becomes feasible to narrow the range of case types for which a complete evaluation of workload and performance is conducted - including the development of case weights and associated performance standards - a clear justification must be provided for prioritizing certain case types along with an explanation of how trial court workload estimates will be extrapolated from data that does not include the entire range of cases heard in the courts. Knowledge of trial court operations in general and in the California court system is highly desirable.

Questions should be directed in writing to mailto:%20solicitations@jud.ca.gov by 1:00 pm Pacific Time, May 6, 2009.

Written proposals must be received no later than 1:00 pm Pacific Time, May 18, 2009.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden - EOP 090416-RB
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposal (RFP) No. EOP 090416-RB.

Intent To Award notice for RFP No. EOP 090416-RB

Request for Proposal

Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules

Attachment 2 - Terms and Conditions

Attachment 3 - Vendor Acceptance

Attachment 4 - Payee Data Form

Attachment 5 - Reference Documents

Addendum 1

Questions and Answers


Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.