Request for Proposal

Parking Facility Management for FSO Throughout The State of California Court System, RFP-FSO-PFMS-2018-21-JP

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2018
  • ID#
    RFP-FSO-PFMS-2018-21-JP

Description

Update: January 10, 2019
Notice of Intent to Award


Update: November 6, 2018
Revised Schedule of Events


Update: October 19, 2018
Answers to Questions - Addendum 1


Update: October 10, 2018
Answers to Questions


The Judicial Council of California (“Judicial Council”), under the leadership of the Chief Justice, is the policymaking body of California’s judicial branch. In accordance with the California Constitution, the council is responsible for ensuring the consistent, independent, impartial, and accessible administration of justice. The California Constitution directs the council to improve the administration of justice by surveying judicial business, recommending improvements to the courts, and making recommendations annually to the Governor and the Legislature. The council also adopts rules for court administration, practice, and procedure, and performs other functions prescribed by law. Facilities Services is the office within the Judicial Council responsible for the planning, design, construction, and real estate and asset management of facilities for the court system of California, including management of parking facilities.

The Facility Services Office and Management, an office within the Judicial Council, is seeking proposals from qualified companies to operate and maintain the Parking Facility Operations as premier, first-class commercial public automobile parking facilities, to diligently and continually satisfy the parking demands generated by tenants, visitors, invitees, the public and customers served by the facilities. Additionally, the Selected Contractor will provide parking related consultation services to include parking rate studies, paid versus open parking analysis, and analysis of various forms of parking lot management. All services shall be provided in accordance with the quality standards, specification, policies, and procedures provided by Judicial Council and the Selected Contractor, which may change from time to time at Judicial Council’s discretion. The term of the Agreement will be for five (5) years with two (2) one-year option. This RFP establishes a general scope and terms of services that should form the basis for each proposal, and the Judicial Council will tentatively select a successful contractor on the basis of the submitted proposals. However, the Judicial Council hereby notifies all prospective contractors that it reserves the right to enter into discussions with the Selected Contractor to negotiate appropriate tailoring of the selected proposal and create a finalized set of terms and conditions for the Agreement.

Questions regarding the RFP should be submitted in writing to the Judicial Council of California via CapitalProgramSolicitations@jud.ca.gov on October 5, 2018, by end of business day.

Proposals must be received by no later than 3:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on October 23, 2018.

Hard and electronic copies of proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn.: Lenore Fraga-Roberts :FSO PFMS 2018 21 JP
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102

RFP

Attachment A – Administrative Rules Form

Attachment B – DVBE Participation Form

Attachment C – List of Parking Lot Facilities

Attachment D – Parking Facilities Specifications

Attachment E - Price-Proposal-Form

Attachment E1 – Price Proposal for Automation

Attachment F – Standard Agreement Sample

Attachment G – Questions and Answers Form

Attachment H – Payee Data Record

Attachment I – Internal Background Check Policy

Attachment J – Darfur Certification Form

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.