Request for Proposal

IT Equipment Refresh, RFP # RFP-ISD-04172017-AA

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2017

Description

Update: June 7, 2017
Intent to Award


Update: May 19, 2017
Questions and Answers


The Judicial Council of California seeks to select qualified firms to provide IT Goods/Computer Equipment for Judicial Council, Supreme Court and Appellate Courts per Specifications. Proposal to enter into Master Agreement/LPA for IT Goods.

The Judicial Council of CA (JCC) is seeking firms to provide proposals for IT Goods # RFP-ISD-04172017-AA.

NOTE: Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to Solicitations@jud.ca.gov by Friday May 19, 2017, at 12:00pm (PDT).

Proposals must be received by Tuesday May 30, 2017 no later than 12:00pm (PDT)

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:

Judicial Council of California
Attn: Alfonso Acosta, RFP-ISD-04172017-AA
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Further specific details regarding the solicitation requirements are set forth in RFP-ISD-04172017-AA and related documents provided, below:

RFP-ISD-04172017-AA

Attachment 1 - Master Agreement Sample

Attachment 2 - Administrative Rules Governing IT Services and Goods

Attachment 3 - Bidders Acceptance of Terms and Conditions

Attachment 4 - General Certifications Form

Attachment 5 - Darfur Act

Attachment 6-Payee Data Record

Attachment 7- DVBE Declaration

Attachment 8 - DVBE Vendor Declaration

Attachment 9 - Small Business Declaration

Attachment 10 - Pricing Sheet

Attachment 11 - Specifications and Quantities and Shipping

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.