Request for Proposal

Review of Uniform Child Support Guideline, RFP# CFCC-2016-10-RBB

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2016

Description

Update November 21, 2016
Intent to Award

Update November 2, 2016
Questions and Answers

Federal law requires that child support guidelines be reviewed by the state at least once every four years to “ensure that their application results in the determination of appropriate child support award amounts,” as promulgated by 42 U.S.C. section 667(a). In compliance, California has adopted a guideline found at its Family Code sections 4050–4076. Therefore, the Judicial Council is soliciting proposals from highly qualified proposers with expertise in the evaluation of child support guidelines to pursue its mandate to periodically review the statewide uniform guideline to recommend to the Legislature appropriate revisions.

The RFP will result in an award for a one-year contract.

Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to solicitations@jud.ca.gov and must be received no later than 3pm PST, Monday, October 31, 2016. Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:

Attention: Stephen Saddler
RFP No: CFCC-16-10-RBB
Judicial Council of California
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Further details regarding the solicitation are set forth in RFP No. CFCC-16-10-RBB and related documents are provided below.

RFP

Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules

Attachment 2 - Standard Provisions

Attachment 3 - Acceptance of Terms and Conditions

Attachment 4 - General Certification

Attachment 5 - Darfur

Attachment 6 - Payee Data Record

Attachment 7 - Cost Breakdown

Attachment 8 - DVBE Declaration

Attachment 9 - DVBE Certification

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.