-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2010
Description
RFP Number: EOP-200902-RB
The AOC is currently seeking a single qualified Web development entity to provide work on an as needed basis under Work Orders issued under a Master Agreement to assist selected trial courts install their html templates, deploy all Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), migrate existing content, and successfully re-launch their Web sites.
IMPORTANT: The scope of work outlined in this RFP pertains to the technical installation of html templates, CSS and .JS files, plus migration of legacy content.
THIS IS NOT A REDESIGN OR WEB GRAPHIC DESIGN PROJECT.
Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to the solicitations@jud.ca.gov by Tuesday, June 1, 2010.
Hard copy proposals must be received by Monday, June 14, 2010, no later than 1:00 p.m. (Pacific Time).
Proposals must be sent to:
Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFP No. EOP-200902-RB
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposal (RFP) No. EOP-200902-RB.
Request for Proposal
Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing Request for Proposals
Attachment 2 - Master Agreement Terms and Conditions
Attachment 3 - Proposer's Acceptance of the RFPs Contract Terms
Attachment 4 - Payee Data Record Form
Attachment 5 - Pricing Information and Conditions
Attachment 6 - Pricing Proposal Template
Addendum 1
Questions & Answers
Attachment 6 - Pricing Proposal Template (Revision 1)
Notice of Intent to Award
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.